BRYTER Avis et détails du produit

BRYTER is very easy and intuitive to use; this makes building decision trees quick and straightforward with minimal training or technical know-how required. The help resources and support provided is some of the best I have come across.

The BRYTER front-end interface has some formatting options but is quite limited compared to other web interfaces.

Our firm is using BRYTER to assist in automating the firm's various business processes (from legal to marketing). When someone has an idea to automate a process that is well structured and rule-based BRYTER can be used to create a decision tree to represent it. This is particularly useful for client-facing marketing initiatives.

The UI is beautiful and intuitive and is the best solution for no-coders.

I'd like a solution for individual lawyers in addition to enterprise pricing.

I've been able to create an automatic contract generation app, thanks to Bryter and it is helping people in India generate free contracts without the help of a lawyer.

What do I like best? The ease of use and the control you have to change and improve the tools you build. The easy-to-learn and understand interface lets you build a tool with "visual code" in no time. You can add the features and details you want, not just what a finished app/tool provider decided to include on their side. You can go back in whenever you want to make adjustments and improvements on your own.

What could be better? The ability to connect or interface with other systems is more limited than I would like. I know the BRYTER team is adding functionality and options tocommunicate with different programs and platforms, but this is the most limiting factor I see with BRYTER. If a task or job requires an entry into another system or a connection to another program that BRYTER cannot handle, the value BRYTER could bring is reduced, since using a BRYTER tool would still require a manual step or another tool to fill the gap between the systems.

I have been using BRYTER to develop tools that can generate first drafts of agreements, and other template-based documents, more quickly and efficiently than using word-based templates or PDF forms. You can create a tool that can customize a draft based on user inputs and still produce a clean and well-formatted product with a few mouse clicks.

Great customer support. Content agnostic tool. Multiple possible applications - can be used for different purposes and across multiple in-house departments.

A minor downside was the learning curve being steeper than initially expected (but this also depends on the complexity of the documents one aims to automate), meaning more time was spent learning how to use it.

Automated generation of standardized legal documents. Strong reduction of time and energy spent on drafting such documents on manual basis and has allowed us to better service our internal clients by being able to focus on higher value matters.

The platform is quick and easy to use - and the first iteration of a product can be developed in a matter of hours. The UI is attractive and embeds well into internal platforms. The support offered by the team at BRYTER is first class. They are always at hand to talk through ideas (including running ideation sessions for lawyers internally) and offer support throughout the development cycle on a new module/product.

It can be difficult to iterate on BRYTER when managing revisions to long and/or complex decision trees. Such instances can be unavoidable where there are updates to legislation/regulation that impact the output of a module.

In our experience, BRYTER is best for modules/products that have a linear question set that arrives at a specific report/output based on the user's selections. By way of an example, it has been used successfully on projects where the user's answers determine a risk score (or indeed any other type of 'score').

Everyone can use it! Even the first demonstrations of Modules / Apps fascinated me; and then with just a little bit of creativity and time, a number of use cases will come up. Each of my colleagues already had an idea what we could do with Bryter. And then I started myself and created a Module for generating of Service Level Agreements for Service-Sales-Team and a Portal for the Global Procurement. Of course, the always friendly and helpful Bryter-Team helped me. The time invested in building your Modules is definitely worth it. With the support of Bryter, you can map even the most complex cases and create contract-generators. Our business now uses our Modules as a matter of course, because the use of the built modules is child's play.

I want to have more time to build more modules for the business. ;-)

NDA, SLA, DPA-Generator ... - provide templates or let the business create its own agreements. Both is possible. The most difficult thing is to take away the shyness of yourself and the users; as soon as you have used it once, whether as a user of a module or as a creator of a module, you will be happy to use it afterwards. In addition to generators for DPA, NDA and SLA, we have also covered LOI, PoA and other standard agreements. We have also made it possible to write standard clauses regarding force majeure, Covid-19, etc. In addition, we enable business to navigate through the "jungle" of the Group's guidelines and policies. And we go on; there are still many ideas ...

- interface - no prior knowledge of programming needed - ability to track the work already done - various modes of models (Live, working) - hidden features one does not even know they need - possibility to create documents at the end of the process is an incredible ease

- sometimes, in case of many elements in the process, it becomes a bit chaotic - otherwise nothing really, I think Bryter is cool

- purchase orders flow - a questionnaire that collects all the important information from the purchaser and creates a document about their requirements - this way is the process automatized and a lot of time is saved - everyone know what they have to do and they can do it any time (no need to wait for an actual person to collect all the information from the purchaser) - lower chance of any kind of mistakes

Development of workflow using low code environment.

I did not find anything that dislikes me

It allows to development of a workflow using complex logic easily and fast.

In scaling organizations like ING there is always the challenge of finding the right information swiftly. BRYTER helps us to design our processes as transparent and seamless as possible, making information more accessible and enabling people to find the information they need, when they need it. This saves our time, our commercial colleagues’ time and means we can provide a faster, better service.

Nothing really. With BRYTER we can automate repetitive tasks which means we’re better able to use our resource with more complex and individual tasks

For example, we use BRYTER to gather information weneed for keeping our contract database up to date.

Improves the collaboration & communciation in companies by providing an tool, which is easy to use. For the development of the process, the backend is very easy to understand.

Preview function is not sufficient, since you always have to click through the whole process and can´t jump directly to the point where you have changed something.

Transparency of a process with lots and lots of stakeholders. The user is guided thorugh the process and sees at the end what he / she needs to do next. Because of that, we were able to decrease questions from the user, which they sent without Bryter. With Bryter they have everything in the output sheet.